AFA Standard · In development

    Provably safe AI financial advice

    The AFA Standard scores your AI against 749 regulation-backed scenarios covering MiFID, IDD and ethics, then stays on as a runtime gate between audits.

    Have an account? Open the validator console

    749
    regulation-backed test scenarios
    MiFID · IDD · Ethics
    coverage
    Independent
    third-party scoring

    The problem

    Nobody can currently prove an AI advisor is compliant

    No sector-specific standard exists yet

    Generic AI safety frameworks don’t test for MiFID suitability, IDD disclosure, or financial advice ethics.

    Firms can’t evidence compliance to a regulator

    Without an independent test and a citation trail, "our AI is fine" isn’t something a regulator or insurer can act on.

    Testing on your own is easy to get wrong

    A benchmark you write yourself, and can quietly learn to pass, isn’t evidence — it needs to come from someone else.

    How it works

    How it works

    1

    Your AI advisor is tested against the AFA matrix

    749 scenarios drawn from actual MiFID, IDD and ethics text, each with citations and pass/fail criteria — not a generic red-team pass.

    2

    Independent scoring, with evidence

    Every answer is judged against the rule it was tested on. You get a report you can actually show a regulator, a partner, or an insurer.

    3

    The same standard runs live, in your request path

    One API call scores an answer against the same matrix before it reaches a client — under a second, returning the rule it was checked against. It advises; your team decides whether to pass, flag, or regenerate. Testing proves the system passed. The runtime gate keeps it passing.

    What you get

    What you get

    A defensible attestation

    Evidence you can bring to a regulator, insurer, or enterprise buyer — not a self-issued badge.

    Built with financial-advice expertise

    The test matrix is grounded in real regulation and reviewed with financial-advice professionals, not written in a vacuum.

    One standard, two layers

    Periodic testing gives you the independent attestation. The runtime gate prevents the bad answer in the first place. The same regulatory matrix sits under both.

    Deploying AI in financial advice? Get ahead of the standard.

    AFA Standard is in active development with financial-sector partners — tell us what you’re building.

    or write to jan.kluz@emable.ai